QualWeb ACT Implementation
| Consistent | Partially consistent | |
|---|---|---|
| WCAG 2 rules | 28 | 3 | 
| Proposed rules | 10 | 18 | 
Implemented Rules
About QualWeb Results
Results in this page are taken from a public test report published by LASIGE, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa. Data is published using the EARL+JSON-LD data format.
Implementation Details
Role attribute has valid value
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  role attribute has valid value procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Role attribute has valid value
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 10 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | None | 
| role attribute has valid value | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
ARIA state or property has valid value
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  ARIA state or property has valid value procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  ARIA state or property has valid value
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 21 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | None | 
| ARIA state or property has valid value | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Passed Example 7 | passed | 
| Passed Example 8 | passed | 
| Passed Example 9 | passed | 
| Passed Example 10 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Failed Example 6 | failed | 
| Failed Example 7 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
ARIA attribute is defined in WAI-ARIA
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  aria-* attribute is defined in WAI-ARIA procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  ARIA attribute is defined in WAI-ARIA
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 7 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | None | 
| aria-* attribute is defined in WAI-ARIA | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
Element with lang attribute has valid language tag
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Element within body has valid lang attribute procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Element with lang attribute has valid language tag
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 19 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Element within body has valid lang attribute | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Failed Example 6 | failed | 
| Failed Example 7 | failed | 
| Failed Example 8 | failed | 
| Failed Example 9 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
Menuitem has non-empty accessible name
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Menuitem has non-empty accessible name procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Menuitem has non-empty accessible name
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 8 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Menuitem has non-empty accessible name | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
Iframe with interactive elements is not excluded from tab-order
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  iframe with negative tabindex has no interactive elements procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Iframe with interactive elements is not excluded from tab-order
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 9 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| iframe with negative tabindex has no interactive elements | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 * | untested | 
*: These examples are not yet approved for the rule. Results on these outcomes are not taken into consideration determining the consistency and coverage.
Important letter spacing in style attributes is wide enough
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Letter spacing in style attributes is not !important procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Important letter spacing in style attributes is wide enough
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 19 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Letter spacing in style attributes is not !important | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 7 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 8 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 9 | passed | 
Important word spacing in style attributes is wide enough
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Word spacing in style attributes is not !important procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Important word spacing in style attributes is wide enough
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 19 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Word spacing in style attributes is not !important | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 7 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 8 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 9 | passed | 
Important line height in style attributes is wide enough
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Line height in style attributes is not !important procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Important line height in style attributes is wide enough
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 24 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Line height in style attributes is not !important | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Passed Example 7 | passed | 
| Passed Example 8 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Failed Example 6 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 7 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 8 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 9 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 10 | passed | 
autocomplete attribute has valid value
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  autocomplete attribute has valid value procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  autocomplete attribute has valid value
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 28 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| autocomplete attribute has valid value | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Passed Example 7 | passed | 
| Passed Example 8 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 9 | passed | 
| Failed Example 6 | failed | 
| Failed Example 7 | failed | 
| Failed Example 8 | failed | 
| Failed Example 9 | failed | 
| Failed Example 10 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 8 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 9 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 8 * | untested | 
| Inapplicable Example 9 * | untested | 
*: These examples are not yet approved for the rule. Results on these outcomes are not taken into consideration determining the consistency and coverage.
Button has non-empty accessible name
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Button has accessible name procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Button has non-empty accessible name
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 17 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Button has accessible name | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Passed Example 7 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
Element marked as decorative is not exposed
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Element marked as decorative is not exposed procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Element marked as decorative is not exposed
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 10 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | None | 
| Element marked as decorative is not exposed | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
Form field has non-empty accessible name
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Form control has accessible name procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Form field has non-empty accessible name
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 19 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Form control has accessible name | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Passed Example 7 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Failed Example 6 | failed | 
| Failed Example 7 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 8 | passed | 
| Failed Example 8 | failed | 
| Passed Example 8 * | untested | 
*: These examples are not yet approved for the rule. Results on these outcomes are not taken into consideration determining the consistency and coverage.
HTML page lang attribute has valid language tag
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Validity of HTML Lang attribute procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  HTML page lang attribute has valid language tag
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 7 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Validity of HTML Lang attribute | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
HTML page has non-empty title
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  HTML Page has a title procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  HTML page has non-empty title
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 11 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| HTML Page has a title | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
Image button has non-empty accessible name
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Image button has accessible name procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Image button has non-empty accessible name
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 12 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Image button has accessible name | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
Image has non-empty accessible name
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Image has accessible name procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Image has non-empty accessible name
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 18 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Image has accessible name | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Passed Example 7 | passed | 
| Passed Example 8 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
Link has non-empty accessible name
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Link has accessible name procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Link has non-empty accessible name
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 28 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Link has accessible name | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Passed Example 7 | passed | 
| Passed Example 8 | passed | 
| Passed Example 9 | passed | 
| Passed Example 10 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Failed Example 6 | failed | 
| Failed Example 7 | failed | 
| Failed Example 8 | failed | 
| Failed Example 9 | failed | 
| Failed Example 10 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 11 | passed | 
| Failed Example 11 | failed | 
SVG element with explicit role has non-empty accessible name
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  svg element with explicit role has accessible name procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  SVG element with explicit role has non-empty accessible name
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 10 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| svg element with explicit role has accessible name | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
Element with presentational children has no focusable content
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Element with presentational children has no focusable content procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Element with presentational children has no focusable content
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 7 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Element with presentational children has no focusable content | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
Headers attribute specified on a cell refers to cells in the same table element
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Headers attribute specified on a cell refers to cells in the same table element procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Headers attribute specified on a cell refers to cells in the same table element
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 17 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Headers attribute specified on a cell refers to cells in the same table element | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Passed Example 7 | passed | 
| Passed Example 8 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 * | inapplicable | 
*: These examples are not yet approved for the rule. Results on these outcomes are not taken into consideration determining the consistency and coverage.
Element with aria-hidden has no content in sequential focus navigation
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Element with `aria-hidden` has no focusable content procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Element with aria-hidden has no content in sequential focus navigation
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 15 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Element with `aria-hidden` has no focusable content | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Failed Example 6 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
Meta element has no refresh delay
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Meta-refresh no delay procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Meta element has no refresh delay
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers 13 of the 15 examples.
  
    For 2 examples
    no results were reported. This can happen when examples are newer then the
    test results.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Meta-refresh no delay | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | untested | 
| Passed Example 2 | untested | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 8 | inapplicable | 
Meta viewport allows for zoom
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  meta viewport does not prevent zoom procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Meta viewport allows for zoom
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 11 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| meta viewport does not prevent zoom | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 2 * | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 * | passed | 
| Failed Example 2 * | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 * | failed | 
| Failed Example 7 * | failed | 
*: These examples are not yet approved for the rule. Results on these outcomes are not taken into consideration determining the consistency and coverage.
Object element rendering non-text content has non-empty accessible name
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Object element has non-empty accessible name procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Object element rendering non-text content has non-empty accessible name
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 18 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Object element has non-empty accessible name | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Failed Example 6 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 8 | inapplicable | 
HTML page has lang attribute
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  HTML has lang attribute procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  HTML page has lang attribute
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 7 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| HTML has lang attribute | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
Scrollable content can be reached with sequential focus navigation
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Scrollable element is keyboard accessible procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Scrollable content can be reached with sequential focus navigation
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 10 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Scrollable element is keyboard accessible | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 2 * | untested | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 * | untested | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 * | untested | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 * | untested | 
*: These examples are not yet approved for the rule. Results on these outcomes are not taken into consideration determining the consistency and coverage.
Element in sequential focus order has visible focus
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Element in sequential focus order has visible focus procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Element in sequential focus order has visible focus
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers 2 of the 7 examples.
    On 5 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Element in sequential focus order has visible focus | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 4 * | untested | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 * | untested | 
*: These examples are not yet approved for the rule. Results on these outcomes are not taken into consideration determining the consistency and coverage.
Text has minimum contrast
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Text has minimum contrast procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Text has minimum contrast
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers 26 of the 32 examples.
    On 6 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Text has minimum contrast | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Passed Example 7 | passed | 
| Passed Example 8 | passed | 
| Passed Example 9 | passed | 
| Passed Example 10 | passed | 
| Passed Example 11 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Failed Example 6 | failed | 
| Failed Example 7 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 8 | failed | 
| Failed Example 9 | failed | 
| Failed Example 10 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 8 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 9 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 10 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 11 | inapplicable | 
Text has enhanced contrast
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Text has enhanced contrast procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Text has enhanced contrast
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers 32 of the 34 examples.
    On 2 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
Meta element has no refresh delay (no exception)
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  `meta` element has no refresh delay (no exception) procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Meta element has no refresh delay (no exception)
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers 11 of the 13 examples.
  
    For 2 examples
    no results were reported. This can happen when examples are newer then the
    test results.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| `meta` element has no refresh delay (no exception) | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | untested | 
| Passed Example 2 | untested | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 8 | inapplicable | 
ARIA required context role
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  ARIA required context role procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  ARIA required context role
   proposed rule.
    It covers all 15 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| ARIA required context role | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
ARIA required owned elements
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  ARIA required owned elements procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  ARIA required owned elements
   proposed rule.
    It covers all 17 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| ARIA required owned elements | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Failed Example 6 | failed | 
| Failed Example 7 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
ARIA state or property is permitted
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  ARIA state or property is permitted procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  ARIA state or property is permitted
   proposed rule.
    It covers all 16 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | None | 
| ARIA state or property is permitted | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Passed Example 7 | passed | 
| Passed Example 8 | passed | 
| Passed Example 9 | passed | 
| Passed Example 10 | passed | 
| Passed Example 11 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
Audio element content is media alternative for text
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  audio element content is media alternative for text procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Audio element content is media alternative for text
   proposed rule.
    It covers 2 of the 7 examples.
    On 5 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | None | 
| audio element content is media alternative for text | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
Audio or video element avoids automatically playing audio
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  audio or video has no audio that plays automatically procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Audio or video element avoids automatically playing audio
   proposed rule.
    It covers all 8 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| audio or video has no audio that plays automatically | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
Audio element content has text alternative
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  audio element content has transcript, audio element content is media alternative for text, and Audio element content has text alternative procedures.
    Failed examples should be failed by at least one of these procedures.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Audio element content has text alternative
   proposed rule.
    It covers 3 of the 8 examples.
    On 5 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| audio element content has transcript | audio element content is media alternative for text | Audio element content has text alternative | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 2 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 3 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
Audio element content has transcript
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  audio element content has transcript procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Audio element content has transcript
   proposed rule.
    It covers 2 of the 11 examples.
    On 9 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | None | 
| audio element content has transcript | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 5 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 6 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
Audio or video element that plays automatically has no audio that lasts more than 3 seconds
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Audio or video that plays automatically has no audio that lasts more than 3 seconds procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Audio or video element that plays automatically has no audio that lasts more than 3 seconds
   proposed rule.
    It covers all 7 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | None | 
| Audio or video that plays automatically has no audio that lasts more than 3 seconds | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
Block of repeated content is collapsible
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Block of repeated content is collapsible procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Block of repeated content is collapsible
   proposed rule.
    It covers 1 of the 8 examples.
    On 7 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | None | 
| Block of repeated content is collapsible | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
Bypass Blocks of Repeated Content
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Document has a landmark with non-repeated content, Document has heading for non-repeated content, Block of repeated content is collapsible, Document has an instrument to move focus to non-repeated content, and Bypass Blocks of Repeated Content procedures.
    Failed examples should be failed by at least one of these procedures.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Bypass Blocks of Repeated Content
   proposed rule.
    It covers 1 of the 14 examples.
    On 13 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Document has a landmark with non-repeated content | Document has heading for non-repeated content | Block of repeated content is collapsible | Document has an instrument to move focus to non-repeated content | Bypass Blocks of Repeated Content | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 2 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 3 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 4 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 5 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 6 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 7 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 8 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 9 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 10 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 11 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 12 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
Orientation of the page is not restricted using CSS transforms
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Orientation of the page is not restricted using CSS transform property procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Orientation of the page is not restricted using CSS transforms
   proposed rule.
    It covers all 12 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Orientation of the page is not restricted using CSS transform property | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
Document has heading for non-repeated content
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Document has heading for non-repeated content procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Document has heading for non-repeated content
   proposed rule.
    It covers 2 of the 14 examples.
    On 12 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | None | 
| Document has heading for non-repeated content | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 5 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 6 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 7 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 8 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 9 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
Document has an instrument to move focus to non-repeated content
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Document has an instrument to move focus to non-repeated content procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Document has an instrument to move focus to non-repeated content
   proposed rule.
    It covers 1 of the 12 examples.
    On 11 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | None | 
| Document has an instrument to move focus to non-repeated content | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 5 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 6 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 7 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 8 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
Document has a landmark with non-repeated content
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Document has a landmark with non-repeated content procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Document has a landmark with non-repeated content
   proposed rule.
    It covers 2 of the 8 examples.
    On 6 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | None | 
| Document has a landmark with non-repeated content | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
Heading has non-empty accessible name
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Heading has accessible name procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Heading has non-empty accessible name
   proposed rule.
    It covers all 15 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | None | 
| Heading has accessible name | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Failed Example 6 | failed | 
| Failed Example 7 | failed | 
| Failed Example 8 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
Iframe elements with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  `iframe` elements with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Iframe elements with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose
   proposed rule.
    It covers 9 of the 23 examples.
    On 14 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| `iframe` elements with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 5 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 6 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 7 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 8 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 9 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 10 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 8 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 9 | inapplicable | 
Iframe element has non-empty accessible name
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  iframe element has accessible name procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Iframe element has non-empty accessible name
   proposed rule.
    It covers all 11 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| iframe element has accessible name | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
Error message describes invalid form field value
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Error message describes invalid form field value procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Error message describes invalid form field value
   proposed rule.
    It covers 1 of the 9 examples.
    On 8 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Error message describes invalid form field value | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 5 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
Links with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Links with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Links with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose
   proposed rule.
    It covers 8 of the 21 examples.
    On 13 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Links with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 5 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 6 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 7 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 8 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 9 | passed | 
| Passed Example 10 | passed | 
| Passed Example 11 | passed | 
| Passed Example 12 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 5 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 6 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
Element with role attribute has required states and properties
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Element with role attribute has required states and properties procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Element with role attribute has required states and properties
   proposed rule.
    It covers 14 of the 15 examples.
  
    For 1 example
    no results were reported. This can happen when examples are newer then the
    test results.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | None | 
| Element with role attribute has required states and properties | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | untested | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Failed Example 6 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
Table header cell has assigned cells
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  All table header cells have assigned data cells procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Table header cell has assigned cells
   proposed rule.
    It covers all 16 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| All table header cells have assigned data cells | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable | 
Video element visual-only content has accessible alternative
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  video element visual-only content is media alternative for text, video element visual-only content has transcript, video element visual-only content has audio track alternative, and Video element visual-only content has accessible alternative procedures.
    Failed examples should be failed by at least one of these procedures.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Video element visual-only content has accessible alternative
   proposed rule.
    It covers 2 of the 9 examples.
    On 7 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| video element visual-only content is media alternative for text | video element visual-only content has transcript | video element visual-only content has audio track alternative | Video element visual-only content has accessible alternative | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 2 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 3 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 3 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 4 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
Video element visual-only content is media alternative for text
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  video element visual-only content is media alternative for text procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Video element visual-only content is media alternative for text
   proposed rule.
    It covers 2 of the 7 examples.
    On 5 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | None | 
| video element visual-only content is media alternative for text | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
Video element visual-only content has audio track alternative
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  video element visual-only content has audio track alternative procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Video element visual-only content has audio track alternative
   proposed rule.
    It covers 2 of the 5 examples.
    On 3 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | None | 
| video element visual-only content has audio track alternative | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
Video element visual-only content has transcript
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  video element visual-only content has transcript procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Video element visual-only content has transcript
   proposed rule.
    It covers 2 of the 8 examples.
    On 6 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | None | 
| video element visual-only content has transcript | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
Audio and visuals of video element have transcript
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Audio and visuals of video element have transcript procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Audio and visuals of video element have transcript
   proposed rule.
    It covers 1 of the 5 examples.
    On 4 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Audio and visuals of video element have transcript | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
Visible label is part of accessible name
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Visible label is part of accessible name procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Visible label is part of accessible name
   proposed rule.
    It covers all 15 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Visible label is part of accessible name | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
Zoomed text node is not clipped with CSS overflow
  This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
  Zoomed text node is not clipped with CSS overflow procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Zoomed text node is not clipped with CSS overflow
   proposed rule.
    It covers 5 of the 14 examples.
    On 9 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
| Zoomed text node is not clipped with CSS overflow | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 5 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |